Sorry, But Who Cares?

You are here

In June, Stats Canada released the Canada Survey of Giving, Volunteering and Participating (CSGVP). Side note: as a reformed American, I just love the name of this federal office, like it’s “all stats on all subjects all the time”. A smorgasbord of information – love it! I don’t know if the US has one, but they should.

This report assesses volunteerism across Canada and also breaks those stats down into provincial overviews. And I have to note that the statistics we’re discussing are based on data collected in 2007. Not sure what that time lag is about in this age of real-time information, but I digress.

Overall, the numbers are neither exciting nor revolutionary (sorry). 12.5 million Canadians volunteer – 46% of us. That’s up from 45% in the 2004 study. If you count informal volunteering, that percentage increases to 84% – so great work raking your neighbour’s leaves and carrying grocery bags for Mrs. Headley, too. Hours volunteered didn’t change much, either. The average volunteer gives 166 hours per year (versus 168 in 2004).

Then we get to provincial stats. Reader’s Digest version for BC? The “bad news” is the decrease in overall hours contributed by volunteers – from 199 in 2004 to 172 in 2007. Otherwise, the report is largely uninteresting in its lack of change. Another side note: There is a good bit of interesting data about demographics of volunteers, but that’s not my focus here today. 

So now I’m going to get down to it and question what this survey is all about.

First, let’s talk about volunteer hours. Who cares?!? Who cares how long we did it for – as long as we got the job done? If I’m a board chair, and cut down our monthly meetings to 1.5 hours from 2 by increasing the efficiency of our work and focusing only on issues relevant to board-level conversation – I say GREAT.

Measuring hours is like comparing how quickly I can fix a computer to how quickly someone who actually knows how to fix computers does it. It tells us absolutely NOTHING about what work was done. And in the case of me fixing a computer, how much work then needed to be redone unnecessarily. Someone could volunteer 1,000 hours and accomplish nothing – except that the stats would look good. It’s hard for me to get excited about that. So instead of measuring how many hours your volunteers work with you, why don’t you measure what impact they had on your organization, your clients and your mission?

Now let’s talk about number of volunteers. I do think this is important. I’m a personal believer that we all owe each other something, and contributing to civil society through informal or formal volunteering is important. So let’s encourage everyone to volunteer and get excited when that number is high.

But I don’t think we can stop there. 30 volunteers sitting around re-painting one fence says absolutely NOTHING about what work was done. And we’ve all been at those team volunteering events, right? I’m reminded of “how many __________ does it take to screw in a light bulb” jokes. Let’s talk about impact and not just numbers. I’d rather have one volunteer with an incredible impact on my organization than 50 with almost no impact. It might mess up the stats, but if it gets me closer to delivering mission, that’s where I want to be. Isn’t that where we all want to be?

So I’m officially starting my list of what Stats Can could be measuring. And until they do it, perhaps we can measure these things ourselves at our organizations:

  • Will you volunteer again at all?
  • Will you volunteer again with the same organization?
  • Will you volunteer again in the same volunteer role?
  • Will you encourage your children to volunteer?
  • Did you tell your friends, family or coworkers about your volunteer role/s?
  • Have you become an informal advocate on behalf of the organization for which you volunteered?
  • Have you become an informal advocate on behalf of the cause for which you volunteered?
  • How did your volunteer work contribute to the mission of the organization?
  • And for the organizations – what did volunteers contribute to your mission?

Our volunteers should be putting their personal passion and individual expertise to use for fulfilling our missions. How long that takes them, or how many of them it takes, just isn’t my biggest concern. If volunteers are engaged well, getting something out of their experience, and willing to come back again – then we’ve succeeded. Period.

How do you think we could measure successful volunteer engagement?

Comments

Anonymous's picture
Anonymous (not verified) on
Virginia, This triggered for me a session I went to at the Association for Nonprofit and Social Economy Research conference in May. The presenters spoke about the valuation of volunteer activities. They discussed monetary value, but also increases in human capital as well as community connectedness. Volunteerism is often valued by financial means in order to have it make sense in a market-driven society. But you are totally correct - someone volunteering 1000 hours may have achieved absolutely nothing and added no value to the organization and its mission. Whereas a thinktank may attach an equivalent hourly wage and multiply to get 'value', the financial value may be hollow. However, the value of that person's volunteer work may lie in that person's increase self worth or sense of self efficacy. It may lie in connectedness that that person now has with a greater community. But attaching a value to either of those is difficult. So how do we measure successful volunteer engagement? Ask. Ask the program managers supervising the volunteers what value has been created by working with volunteers. Ask the volunteers how they have been impacted. Unfortunately, the results will be largely qualitative, and Statistics Canada doesn't function well with that sort of data. Keep the thoughts flowing! Trina http://trinaisakson.wordpress.com

Contact

info@thevantagepoint.ca
t: 604 875 9144
f: 604 875 0710
1183 Melville Street
Vancouver, BC V6E 2X5

Connect

Donate to Vantage Point and transform the leadership competencies of British Columbia not-for-profit executive directors, board members, staff and volunteers

Facebook icon.Twitter icon. Twitter icon. Youtube icon.

Subscribe

Accreditation